marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,
marycatelli
marycatelli

law and the meta-origin

When reading about how the law would apply to superheroes, sometimes I am mildly annoyed at the treatment of the law as if it were the law of the Medes and Persians that altereth not. Such as -- true, the FAA has authority only over people who fly with devices, and one of the last cases of a British court dealing with witchcraft had the judge telling the witnesses who claimed to see a woman flying that flying was not a crime. The advent of flying superheroes would change that quick -- or might not.

One thing that would affect how it would change would be the meta-origin. And if there were more than one source, it would probably affect how the law changed.

Let us suppose that superheroes first arose in the 19th century. Extremely bookish and learned upper-class men revived classical learning including the Greek magical papyri. Just playing them straight would make them wizards a la Dr. Strange, but if they learned how to transform themselves with powers, they could be superheroes. And since they were upper-class and part of high society, it would be natural for them to be treated as part of the government. Perhaps not even licensed -- that would be vulgar. Crimes could be hushed up and would be unlikely to generate legislation. (Especially if they want to keep the lower classes ignorant of the possibility.)

Or suppose the mad scientists made people super-powered for purposes of exhibiting them in a circus. They would have to be more or less willing, because otherwise they would break free. But if they fought crime, they would be irregulars, vigilantes on the street. Police were not exactly respectable in this era, and the ruling classes would be seriously displeased with extremely powerful low-class crime-fighters who picked the crime they fought based on their own interests. Secret identities would be essential, because they would be criminals. Code names might arise from the cheap papers assigning handles to them as to more ordinary criminals. They might, however, have to tolerate them because they were the only ones capable of dealing super-powered criminals.

There would be in-between cases. Suppose up-and-coming scientists were involved in making superheroes. Much less respectable, in the vulgar "stinks" of science, though perhaps they could be co-opted. At least if they were willing to be brought into the ruling class. They would probably be licensed, if they were respectable sorts, if only -- to deal with those of them who go renegade.

Or esoteric cults that gained power and fought against strange beings that threaten the world from etheric realms, and perhaps against their own renegade members. And solemnly warned about getting back into the exoteric powers of the world as a temptation to fall from their high calling and also forming an obstacle to drawing people into the cult. However upper-crust the members, the government would not be pleased with this sort of withdrawal from society, especially when the renegades can be so dangerous. And when the members came from lower ranks, it would be regarded as even more dangerous, however unreasonable, and the laws propagated according.

And if all four existed, they would have different laws for dealing with them.
Tags: metaorigins, world-building: law, world-building: social structure
Subscribe

  • rewriting legends

    Was pondering Robin Hood and legends in general after re-reading Howard Pyle's Merry Adventures of Robin Hood. It did not hold up to childhood…

  • a sequel looms

    Haven't even finished the first sequel, and it's suggesting a third story in the sequence. Suggesting it very vaguely. If one witch is taken out,…

  • once upon a christening

    A fairy who had not been invited showed up to the christening. So she shows up and curses the princess to sleep for a century. Politics are behind…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments