marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,

a conundrum of writing groups

When the bulk of your writing group dislikes a stretch of your story, usually it's a sign of there being a problem there.

Even if they all wildly disagree about what the problem is.  If one says it's too drawn out and one that it's too brisk, or if one says that Jane is too meek and another that she's too bossy, there's still some problem there -- which may be neither of their complaints.  But the stretch clearly has a problem.

Even if, more embarrassingly, they all misread the same point, telling you that it's not clear that it's X when in fact it's not X.  It's a clue that you have to slice out what led to that conclusion or splice in something to point to its being Y.  Even if you have to mutter imprecations about the clue here there and the other place and how there really were no clues at all to its being X and so really there's no excuse.

The real fun and games arise when some people single out something for stern criticism -- and other people single it out for particular praise.
Tags: revision, writing groups

  • astute observation

    About spring

  • from spiralling ecstatically this

    from spiralling ecstatically this proud nowhere of earth’s most prodigious night blossoms a newborn babe: around him, eyes –gifted with every keener…

  • years

    For last year's words belong to last year's language And next year's words await another voice. T.S. Eliot, Four Quartets

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded