marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,

omnium gatherum

The omnium gatherum of monsters, used D&D and the like, is not wise in a novel, because it is very hard on unity of theme. But there is the question of how to limit your monsters to actually lend them unity.

There's source. A lamia, a minotaur, a sphinx, nymphs for Greek; giants, a dragon, fairy ladies for chivalric romance -- if your readers know such things, but it does lend a certain unity even if they do not. OTOH, very few of them will know why you have dragons no larger than humans with your vampires.

I was thinking of type but really, that would need a back story. All sorts of chimera, from the chimera itself to a mermecoleon that dies of hunger because its ant body can not digest what its lion head eats, would probably mean, for some reason, you had mad wizards /scientists churning them out, probably in some kind war. Overload of undead means either necromancers at war, or a naturally occurring eruption of very evil magic.

Elemental magic might turn on the elemental structure of the world, though. It might not need history to explain why it erupts into elemental beings.
Tags: the dm vs the writer, unity of theme, world-building: creatures

  • more rewriting legends

    Another issue with rewriting legends -- and this one applies to fairy tales, too. You lose out in ability to surprise people. Unless you provide…

  • rewriting legends

    Was pondering Robin Hood and legends in general after re-reading Howard Pyle's Merry Adventures of Robin Hood. It did not hold up to childhood…

  • a sequel looms

    Haven't even finished the first sequel, and it's suggesting a third story in the sequence. Suggesting it very vaguely. If one witch is taken out,…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded