marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,

revising on the edge of the void

A story needs to be the length it needs to be.  A great aesthetic principle.

Very hard to keep in mind when you are revising, and you know your story is just on the brink of the Unpublishable Void.  With short stories the drop-off to the story that can't be sold on basis of length is gradual, but it has its break points -- 8000 words, for instance.  Very annoying to be just at the edge of it and trying to ignore it because the story really does need some more description, or exposition, or character development. 

Or to be at the other brink, and feeling the temptation to leave in a bit of rambling because the story is just over 75,000 words and would be a hard sell under it.  Even when you remind yourself that you are only one third of the way through revising the novel and you may have plenty of space ahead where expansion is needed to keep things clear and dramatic.

And then for works that go over the other end, you have the short problem with the knowledge that there may be room for contraction later. . . . .

Tags: aesthetics, grumbles, revision, story length

  • supplies

    It may be wise to have the hero and heroine buy food, they know they are in danger of being unable to buy, owing to magic. But either I have to use…

  • dealing with the witch

    ding-dong the witch is dead -- The first one at any rate. I comment on her body first, but then I elaborate on the breaking of her spells.…

  • so that's the problem

    figuring out the weakness of the opening: it's two scenes, and the first is mostly info-dumping. It should start in the forest, talking about…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded