marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,

series and the exception rule

There is a rule about exceptions in a series.

Which is, as soon as you allow one, you will shortly riddle your rule with them.  It's just too easy to allow yourself to do it again, and again, and again. . . .

Which is a real pity because the drama of this it doesn't work that way this time makes a great climax.  Until it gets undermined because its value was its uniqueness.

Doesn't matter what the rule is.  Nobody comes back from the dead; everyone must sacrifice blood to work spells; this stoic character never shows emotion.

The real irony is when it is done (almost) right as a new discovery or development.  'cause it often seems that as soon as the new rule is propounded, everyone knew it, and always knew it.  And it never spreads or even has serious arguments against it.  (Raising the question of why the old rule lasted so long, if there were no arguments for it.)

Suppose the only way around it is not to allow the exceptions, unless you've got the time to make them central, and show the development.  sigh

Tags: series

  • Mistress of the Waves

    Mistress of the Waves by George Phillies On another world, the narrator is fishing from her boat when an off-worlder is swept from his. She has to…

  • Pirate of the Prophecy

    Pirate of the Prophecy by Jack Campbell Empress of the Endless Sea book 1. A prequel series. I don't think there are any spoilers for Pillars of…

  • Boundless

    Boundless by Jack Campbell The Lost Fleet: Outlands book 1 -- the third series. Spoilers ahead for the first two. Opens with delivering evidence,…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded