marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,

further on philosophizing in fiction

Another problem with abstract ideas over moments is that the moment tend to announce their location -- beginning, middle, end.  Even when you have hashed your concept down to conflict, they do not necessarily lead to an order.

If two characters are thrashing arguments back and forth about whether democracy is a sane form of government, the arguments will arise as they occur to the characters, not in an orderly fashion like a textbook.  Indeed, if it resembles it too much, the readers may reject it as too neat and schematic.

And there may not be a good order to put them in.  Some arguments are better in sequence than in structure.

Plus, of course, the way you've still got to build complications to climax, and keep a sequence of cause-and-effect going to drive the story.  Just because you're deriving it from an abstract argument doesn't let you off on any story requirements.

Tags: dialog, motivations, story structure, theme, writing audience

  • O come, O come, Emmanuel

    O come, O come, Emmanuel, And ransom captive Israel, That mourns in lonely exile here Until the Son of God appear. Rejoice! Rejoice! O Israel! To…

  • The King shall come when morning dawns

    The King shall come when morning dawns, And light triumphant breaks; When beauty gilds the eastern hills, And life to joy awakes. Not as of old, a…

  • On Jordan's bank

    On Jordan's bank, the Baptist's cry Announces that the Lord is nigh; Awake, and hearken, for he brings Glad tidings of the King of kings! Then…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded