marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,
marycatelli
marycatelli

In Front of Your Nose

In Front of Your Nose:  The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters, vol. 4 1945-1950 by George Orwell.

The last of the volumes.  More essays than letters, and even the essays are less personal and more political.  Communism, which was a thread throughout the first three, really comes out in full force.

Still some primary source with interesting tidbits, like asking a correspondent whether he's torn up his ration book for clothes, and recounting how people don't really believe it.  (They went off clothes rationing in 1949.)

Also stuff about hunger in Europe after the war, objecting to some nasty post-war trials, discussing Communist atrocities and how they were not to be discussed.

Essays on writing in general -- this is where "Politics and the English Language" appears -- and on various authors, sometimes vitiated by his blindspots (they can be amusing insights into Orwell, to be sure).  Though at one point he observes that a book that opposes you makes you angry which is hard to see around, he doesn't observe that it is also likely to come across as falsified.  (Socialist Realism is bad not only for the lack of conflict, but because it assumes the collective action problem out of existence, and beings without the collective action problem aren't human.)  Actually, I think his best is his essay on Tolstoy's attack on Shakespeare because there he comes to grip with the ideas and argues with them.

He wrestles with the Soviet views on literature and at one point observes he can feel more sorry for the persecutors than their victims because the victims at least have the clarity of knowing what is going on, where the persecutors are shocked and bewildered and unable to fathom why providing the best of everything to writers nevertheless does not produce the literature they desire.  (Despite his Socialism, Orwell realizes that writers, at least, need some freedom to produce.)

He also had a bad shock from the atom bomb, which appears to have seriously shaken his views on progress.  Nevertheless, he keeps arguing from the assumption that historical inevitability exists, and that he can discern it.  I wonder how his views would have changed if he had lived to see the effects of the welfare state and the fall of Communism.
Tags: history reviews: communism, history reviews: world war ii era, lit crit, non-fiction: essays, non-historical non-fiction reviews, primary source review
Subscribe

  • Bones of the Past

    Bones of the Past by Drew Hayes Villains' Code book 2. spoilers for the first ahead. Life in the world of a supervillain. . . opening with an…

  • Repercussions

    Repercussions by Marion G. Harmon Wearing the Cape book 8. Serious spoilers for the previous books. Astra and the team are mostly relaxing.…

  • Astro City, Vol. 14: Reflections

    Astro City, Vol. 14: Reflections by Kurt Busiek Stand-alone stories, though it benefits from knowing who these people are. Samaritan has to stand…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments