marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,

structural surgery and memory

First step in revision is sticking the story on the back burner to bubble away there and get it out of your memory.  That helps with letting you see what you actually wrote rather than what you fondly imagined you wrote.

The downside, sometimes, is that you forget why you put stuff in.

True, if something on the revision pass looks incongruous, it's probably a problem.  It does not, however, mean that it can be excised and thrown away.  It may need to be reworked.  Or relocated.  Or replaced with something else only resembling it in structural function -- to contrast with something else, to motivate, to explain a needed detail.

The thing is, it can be really hard to notice that when you forgot what happened next.  If it's to set up the next line of dialog, excising it can be fixed quickly.  If it's a scene or two -- or three or four -- later, it can be harder.  Especially when considering whether a whole scene ought to go, being unnecessary, or at least not pulling its own weight for its length.

Most of the time I have enough of the plot in memory that I can remember.  To be sure that means the old has a magnetic attraction to it because I know what to expect. . . .


The delights of a writer's life.
Tags: revision, story structure

  • the sequel

    Finished outlining my sequel to my Sleeping Beauty story -- set the century later, when she wakes up. It's about the prince who is her cousin's…

  • a bee, a wolf, a duck. . . .

    Once yesterday's love interest introduced herself, her part of the story fell together. So I could consider the important part of the story, where…

  • Enter a love interest. Later, enter another

    Was poking at the outline to see if it really was stymied at the point. (Long journey, got to put some filigree in there, but not enough to…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded