marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,

the game of names

Once read an article about naming characters in soap operas.  The point I particularly remember was the guy who said that if you want to introduce the town mayor, you can't name him Leftie.  However, once you have introduced Leftie to the soap opera, and established him as a character, there's certainly no reason why he can't run for mayor.

Which principle I'm trying to keep in mind at the moment.  The treacherous, deceptive (hollow!) characters they are meeting should have names that match their facade, not their reality.  The readers can't see them on the page, so the names should reinforce their appearance.

Especially since they probably chose the names for their impact on travelers.  Every little bit helps when you're building a facade.

But I know what stinkers they are.  Which means I have wrestle that impulse down and reach for mellifluous names that sound convincing in their era.  Ah, well, at least I don't have to name as many in the outline as I will in the full manuscript, no doubt.
Tags: names, writing audience

  • the game of names

    Why, yes, it's a good idea to name her. She is, after all, the hero's late wife. . . . The fun of it being that her plot device purpose is to have…

  • the dm vs the writer: unity and balance

    One thing that helps with unity of theme is a unified threat. The random assemblage of monsters is not in any way a story because there is no real…

  • genre

    A mystery reader, confronted with a large mass of sudden detail, is going to go—subconsciously, at least— "Aha! somewhere in all of this the writer…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded