marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,

royal irresponsibility


For some reason, I seem to have hit a rash of works in which the author seems to think that the best way to introduce a royal character as the main character is to show him blowing off his duties.

Not just at any idle moment of leisure. Explicitly blowing the duties off. As if the point of being royal was to skim off the pleasures and the ease of living and take them as one's due. They aren't villains, and they aren't even flawed royals who will learn better in the course of the work. If anything, I think it's supposed to make them sympathetic.

And what we see a character doing when first introduced is perhaps the most defining trait we see. It's hard to undermine the first impression when it's all we know about them.

grumble, grumble, grouse grouse grouse
Tags: characterization, sympathy, world-building: royalty

  • metaorigins and society

    Metaorigins would affect how superpowers affect society more than anything else except the nature of the powers -- type or strength. And in some…

  • observations about inspiration

    One can discuss what the effect of power levels, and number of superheroes, are on world-building. But when building a superhero story, one doesn't…

  • ages of history

    So, once upon a time, there were evil wizards making everyone miserable. Some of the more minor wizards banded together and took over and made…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded