marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,

secrets of sagacity

When introducing your sage and presenting him as really wise. . .

On top of the troubles of either giving him actually wise things to say, or convincing us that he's wise by rhetoric without actually committing yourself -- there's the question of point of view.

I've recently been reading a book where there is indeed a wise character -- grave, foresightful, prudent -- and then in one scene he went to explain himself to another character.


Not throw against the wall bad, but it struck a false note.  Rather like the few stories where Doyle made Sherlock Holmes the point of view character, or the one where Wodehouse made Jeeves.  It is very, very, very difficult to actually tell a story from the impressive point-of-view.

Even the mere verbal side of it is quite hard enough.  I have been known to observe that many fictional sages would be improved by ripping off Marcus Aurelius's Meditations, but then I recently re-read and was pondering, philosophically, how much my understanding was predicated on my previous knowledge of Stoicism.  It's not easy, figuring out what sort of wisdom to put in their mouths.
Tags: characterization, dialog, point of view, sagacity

  • ages of history

    So, once upon a time, there were evil wizards making everyone miserable. Some of the more minor wizards banded together and took over and made…

  • D&D and the Connecticut Yankee

    The deep fundamental questions of life: If you were thrown into a D&D universe, and wanted to play the Connecticut Yankee and improve things, what…

  • super from space

    Can you really have a superhero story where all the super-powered are aliens from outer space? Not if they all come from the same planet and have…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded