marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,
marycatelli
marycatelli

a word to the wise about wacky, weird, wonderful world-building

I love world-building that takes all the the standard world-building questions and flings them out the window by being so weird that no one would think to apply them.  Like -- all the characters are chess pieces.

It does have one sneaking disadvantages, though.  You have to remember it all the time.

Let us suppose your characters are underwater, and you remember to put in owing to buoyancy, they don't feel a downward pressure.  Then you give them a sofa to rest on, and worse, give it soft pillows.

You'd float over a hard surface as well as above a soft one.

Mermaid furniture ought to be very, very, very different from air-breathing folks' furniture.

Or if a world is permeated with enchantments, whenever something shows up, odds are, it ought to be enchanted.

Or when you set up a setting with a color schema, and then forget it when it comes to describing a landscape somewhat later.

It's that when you change the rules, you don't change your reflexes.  You reach automatically for what would be reasonable under the old rules.
Tags: sensawunda, setting (whole story), world-building: other
Subscribe

  • philosophy of checklists

    was pondering checklists for world-building, and the possibility of one for a superheroic world. . . . The problem is that they are lists, and…

  • dealing with the witch

    ding-dong the witch is dead -- The first one at any rate. I comment on her body first, but then I elaborate on the breaking of her spells.…

  • observations about inspiration

    One can discuss what the effect of power levels, and number of superheroes, are on world-building. But when building a superhero story, one doesn't…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 4 comments