marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,

wizardry and guilds

Read a D&D article talking of rigid and powerful guilds, with a handful of masterships, dangled before the journeymen but in reality given only to the children of masters, keeping all the wizards under a rigid list of spells. . . talked of late medieval guilds that worked like that.

To which I instantly thought -- bet you none of those guilds had products of immediate military use.

Your best case scenario, in that case, is that the other guilds band together and start to demand that you churn out more fireball capable wizards. Why are you getting all the same treatment as the rest of the city's guilds, if you don't do what you can to defend it?

Worst case? A bunch of fireball capable wizards runs over your city. Not vitrifying it in the process, one hopes -- but your wizards won't be able to stop it. All it takes is one guild that decides that the utility of wizards is greater than their risk.

And what if no guild does? That bunch? It could be a red dragon. Or a horde of giants, or orcs, or wererats. It is, after all, a D&D universe.
Tags: politics, world-building: economics, world-building: magic (technique), world-building: military matters

  • down the years

    Ah, the bildungsroman! I know the years ahead. I know many events that will happen in them. I even know that some will happen before others! It's…

  • planning a project

    All the girls are putting their heads together for their project. What shall they do, what shall they do? It's crucial. It's their master project and…

  • adventures in plot devices

    I set out the hero on the first page of his story, and I realize I don't introduce the adventure of the forest until the second page, and there's no…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded