marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,

metaphysical reflections

It's often a mistake to get down into the metaphysical principles of a fictional world.

It boxes you in, it raises questions of realism (because it's hard to be convincing), and it requires a degree of profundity, since it's the foundations of the world.

But after some recent reads, I add another point:  if you do have to bring in metaphysics, keep at least part of it mysterious.  Yes, the Great Hall can be a microcosm on which the universe depends, with the sun the moon and the stars in the rafters.  Yes, the hero can need to wind clocks to keep the universe going right.  But don't let him understand all of why he does it.  Especially not if he's a viewpoint character.  We have to understand him, then, and if we can fathom a character who can fathom the universe -- why, it's not a very impressive universe there.

(Letting him reveal himself in dialogue can also be dangerous.  Beware of how much a being of metaphysical significance confides in anyone.)
Tags: ambiguity, realism, sagacity, setting (whole story), world-building: metaphysics

  • for the birds

    Wading through the story, throwing in birds here and there. Enough to ensure that the reader knows that there are always birds, often of strange and…

  • outlines and subplots

    I think there are going to be subplots. I know that one villainess likes intrigue, and another likes handing magical tutoring to foolish young folk…

  • so that's the problem

    figuring out the weakness of the opening: it's two scenes, and the first is mostly info-dumping. It should start in the forest, talking about…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded