marycatelli (marycatelli) wrote,

wands and wood

I was reading this article on  Pottermore and thinking -- you know that's really a salesman's pitch.

Notice that, for instance, nothing is really recommended for a weakling.  One would think it most important that one whose magic is weak have a wand capable of picking up the faintest of impulses to amplify.

I can see just brushing on suitability for the Dark Arts for obvious reasons, but the virtues?  All right, you have some -- love of luxury, tendency to anger, hidden insecurity -- but if you want something for the stupid, the weak-willed, the deceitful, or even just the home-bodies, you can at best read between the lines for the suitable wands.

One wonders if the frequent mention of strength of character merely reflects how vital that is to wizardry in general.
Tags: web articles, world-building: magic (objects)

  • rhetoric

    And its reasons

  • 'tis the voice of a child

    One complication of using a child as the point of view character is keeping not just the observations within the child's power to make, but the…

  • further first-person philosophy

    Though just a bit this time: If you have several first-person points of view in the story, and I have to flip back to the chapter opening to…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded